Critical Photo-Essay

Jodi critical photo project2

View more presentations from jodiw12.

Not the link I'd intended!!!

Matt Parsons brought to my attention that the link I'd posted was DEFINATELY NOT the one I had meant to post!!!

So embarassed.........

I tried trying something new and exciting by adding a picture to my blog since I'd seen others doing the same.  Apparently that was a FAIL.

It wasv SUPPOSED to be a flow chart of how arguments go on the internet...which I'm not going to even try to post again.

All the more reason to enjoy the box that I live in.

Online conversations

HOLY COW! My jaw sure did drop when I watched Alexandra Wallace’s video.  She had an idea, or annoyance, and went with it.  Posting a video like that is definitely doing to gather an audience – both supporters and not.

And so the online ‘conversation’ begins...

Alexandra put out an idea and her audience (intended or not) replied.  The Ching Chong Song made light of the matter (mostly) while the other one did her best to call Wallace out.  Each of these responses soon had their own, separate audiences for a multitude of reasons.  The three videos, together, ultimately created one big, massive mess of an ‘internet community’ that is made up of all types of ages groups, socio economic groups, and cultural groups from all over the nation, and the world.

What other communicative technology has that kind of power and capability? 

What I’m trying to say is, that the readings and the videos for this week really got me to start thinking about online communication and how very odd it is.  I’ve really started paying attention reading and paying attention to the comments that people post on online newspapers and news articles.  Not because I’m interested in what they have to say, but because I’m interested in what they have to say to EACH OTHER.

People get into some serious bitching matches in the comment sections of these web articles with personal opinions, political views…etc.  While reading through them I can’t help but laugh and think about the argument that these people are having…with the internet, on the internet, with people who they don’t know anything about besides their web name and what they said.  I’d be willing to bet that the people who get into these matches on the internet would NEVER say the exact same words (or name calling strategies) to the person they’re arguing with to their face. 

The arguments on the internet and arguments in person have extremely different consequences and outcomes.  In person, the argument happens within minutes, and if you make the other person mad enough they can hit you…and more importantly identify you.  Arguments on newspaper comments are generally pretty anonymous and lack the type of personal responsibility that personal communications hold.

I also enjoyed thinking about data and visuals working together to make data easier to understand.  I’m a visual learning and absolutely hate when straight up percentages are given, or even just set amounts; SHOWING people what the numbers are talking about makes for a much less confused audience.

Reading Visually Blog

"Reading" and how it is done has changed drastically since the invention and acceptance of the internet and texting.  Short-handed writing, as well as shortened reading have become the norm when trying to get through writing as well as reading.  I often find myself short handing things in my drafts (I write all of my drafts rather than type them, which is another issue from this entirely...) as well as shortening  my reading as much as possible when it comes to texting and Facebook posts.  I succeed at short-hand writing, but not so much at short-handed reading.  I've tried skimming, pecking, and filtering to nearly no avail.  On Facebook, with the newspaper, and other pieces that I just want the "bulk" of information, I can generally find what I want quickly.  But when it comes to reading for a class and finding the meaning out of it, I constantly find myself going back to the parts that I skimmed over after feeling guilty of possibly missing something important, like Sosnoski referred to feeling.

I don't believe that the short-handed reading of skimming, pecking, and filtering are hindering readers, rather I feel like it makes them more able to get through larger pieces of material while allowing them to narrow in on what the important information is within the text, rather than getting "this" and "that" with a mix of important info. We are a generation that loves multitasking, and the skimming of articles allows us to complete more tasks in a shorter amount of time.

As far as the A/V Projects, I loved watching every one's take on such a broad topic!  It was neat to see where every one went with it. 

Kara's was beautifully made and I loved remembering those who famously "lived fast and died young."  At the ending, the sad truht of how life can be taken so suddenly and be too short was brought to every one's attention.  I thought that the transitions were great and the music fit well.

Carson's with Elmo had a nice and unique twist to it.  I thought that it was fun and quirky and the music was great!  I really enjoyed how she actually made a coherent and continuous video rather than using a grouping of still-photos like I did, myself.  It was very well thought out and the composition of the piece clearly took some time.

Michelle's took a different approached and looked into the sport of cross training and fitness.  I really enjoyed seeing the effort and dedication that it takes to perform in such a demanding sport.  I felt like it was very educational and realistic.  She worked with a variety of shots and angles to integrate different components to the piece.

Chris P.'s was also a good one to watch because he used a lot of texts to actually educate the viewer.  The music tied in well with the images that were being presented which is important because visuals and sounds are what make a video project either work or fail for the viewers.

And last but not least, I LOVED Savannah's! I thought the the images and the music were so great!  The editing and visuals were perfect for representing Bozeman and the idea of "Welcome Home."  It made me feel like I was being welcomed back to the Bozo community!

Great projects all around and I definitely have a new found respect for those who do this type of thing for a living! and even more for leisure!

Week 3

I really enjoyed Robinson’s TEDTalk.  In the beginning he stated that many people are accused of ‘making poor use of their talents’ and ‘don’t believe that they are good at anything.’  I can relate to the whole not being good at anything, as I’m sure a lot of people can.  I have never believed that I am good at any one thing in particular. Instead, I consider myself to be average or below average in most things.  Math and science have always been two subjects that I’ve never enjoyed nor completely understood, making me less than average at both and I don’t see any reason to better the statuses at this point.  Writing and reading, however, are completely different for me.  I have always loved writing stories about my friends and past experiences, and reading is one of my favorite pastimes. Would I say I excel at these? No.  But do I enjoy them? Well, for the most part, yes!

Robinson said that the people who are most happy with their careers are the ones who do not look at their jobs as jobs, but as piece of “who they are.”  We all know that unless an author writes a best-seller, there’s not a whole lot of profit in an English/Writing major’s future.  But, there is the importance of being happy with going to work each day.  And I know for a fact that if I had to crunch numbers  for the rest of my life, day after day, hour after hour, I’d be one miserable person to be around.

Another important topic in this week’s reading and videos was the issue of presenting information to an audience in a useful and effective manner using presentation of fonts, punctuation, and imagery.  In Goetz’s Talk, he discussed his research on making medical data make sense to patients – whooda thunk! – Taking the information and color-coding it good, bad, and borderline should not have taken as long as it did because so many things in the world are categorized according to color to represent data.  But the reason it took so long also makes sense, according to Godin, because the data wasn’t broken for the doctors who were using it for patient testing and were then translating it to their patients.

                All of this started to make me thinking about all of the advertisements about avoiding drinking and driving.  Fonts, which make statements in all pieces of writing,help attract different audiences and reader attention, along with images that are sometimes placed next to the words. Anyways, these advertisements are meant to encourage drinkers to either designate a driver or find other means of transportation home.  Recently, I saw a bumper sticker that looked like this:

First off, the font does not come across as to be taken seriously, nor does he image of the penguin with the devil horns??  Everyone KNOWS drinking and driving is unsafe and should be avoided, but the seriousness of the action is not always portrayed in a serious manner in stickers like this or even on commercials (I’m thinking of the one where the guy calls his friend for a ride…which turns out to be a horse?).  And secondly, do either the bumper sticker or the cute commercial present the issue in as serious a manner as law enforcement and other officials wish it to be taken? Would stronger fonts and presentations make the audience more aware of the consequences?

Proposal

For my Critical Photo-essay I would like to explore the question: How has technology influenced todays writers and how will this impact the sharing of writing in the future?  Writing was originally created for record keeping, rather than for the sharing of the knowledge those records held.  Today, writing is being done on technologies that allow for a very large audience to view an author’s writing within minutes of its publication on the web.

                      Blogs, Facebook, and Twitter allow for a large audience to follow an unlimited amount of “authors” and to read their writing at a moment’s notice.  The sharing of the writing is available after the authors post their latest status update or shares a restaurant discovery on their food blog.  Does this quick transfer of writing and communication weaken the authors’ credibility? How does the quick output of information develop a new, more advanced type of audience?

                Overall, I would like to compare how writing used to be created and shared and how the audience accessed the writing, to how it is presently being processed and what this means for the future of writing.  (I think..?)

Week 2 Blogging

From Pencils to Pixels

All of the articles for this week had to do with the advancements of technology and how these advancements effect communications between people, as well as how texts are read and knowledge is learned.

In Dennis Baron’s piece, From Pencils to Pixels, it was surprising to me that a pencil could cause such uproar and be viewed as an untrustworthy object when it came to writing and creating records. Since the invention of the pencil, technology has expanded to pens, printing presses, computers, iPads, etc. And just as the pencil caused controversy, so do these inventions.  How people communicate, learn, and perform day-to-day task are being “taken over” by technological advancements.

Baron also discusses the integration of computers in the classrooms and what difficulties the instructors had with the technological transition.  The thought that teachers used to have a fit over students using spellcheck before handing in a paper is beyond me.  It is a tool that may not necessarily help students understand how to spell a word, but if used often enough, they could become familiarized with the correct spelling. (This wuld b a nice feetur for FB statises!! J) Spellcheck has become essential for many students as well as those who are in search of a job and need to ensure that everything on a resume is spelt correctly.

Technology has become a vital piece of how we communicate with family members, friends, educators, and coworkers…unless, of course, you are a member of The Lead Pencil Club.

History Now

The libraries at my high school hated Wikipedia with an absolute passion.  We would be scolded if they caught us on it, and if we tried to reference it in a paper it wouldn’t be accepted.  So, I still tend to think that Wikipedia is an unreliable source that can’t be trusted. 

History Now got me thinking…

After reading the article, I see Wikipedia more as an interactive encyclopedia, or blog, that people share information on.  Is it correct information? I don’t know.  But those who take the time to write summaries of topics and subjects on the site most likely know a thing or two about what they are writing and “become active on their own impulse.” Which is encouraging, but I still don’t think my high school librarians would approve.

“…Wiki does not inevitably lead to chaotic contents because for each person who deletes contributions or writes nonsense, there are several others who cancel or improve the change again.”  This statement is reassuring, but what if you’re the poor college student who waited until the last minute to write a final, 20-paged paper and some bored middle-schooler *revised* all the information minutes before you opened the site an no one has popped by to fix it yet?

I feel like Wikipedia is a good place to get started when scoping out information, but that other sources should always be used to decipher if the information is true or not, which should normally be done anyways.

The article also explained the changes of how users of Wikipedia are communicating and interacting, which seemed to resemble a blog-type atmosphere, which I had never thought of before and encourages it’s users to interact with the text in a uniform, yet at the same time, diverse way.  This thought reminded me of Whitacre and his virtual choir.

IText

“Texts provide shared visions around which joint work can be organized.  In this role, texts serve to stabilize knowledge, a function that is important, for instance, in establishing intellectual property.”

This quote made me think about Facebook and the kind of role it plays in our society.  Facebook is a joint work.  It is organized to bring people from all around the world together, in one common “place” on the web.  It stabilizes many different types of knowledge to others who look at ones page.  Things like family members, friends, location, emotions, relationship status, birthdate, and the list goes on.  Facebook has brought about a new way of stabilizing personal knowledge about people and their lifestyles.  Facebook “groups” have become a way of one to establish an intellectual property with people who sharer similar interests and are also members of the social group. 

Facebook, as much as it can be looked down on for intruding privacy and other accusations against the site, helps us “get to know” one another in ways never thought possible, and in all reality, shows a person’s true identity to the world more so than in-person meetings can do.

The Database and the Essay

While reading this piece, I was interested in the fact that the author described writing as a social act, rather than individual.  A description that I think fits writing and the writing process very well.  In my creative writing course this last semester my professor encouraged us to give suggestions to each short-story author in our class, as well as to her.  So we would edit and revise each other’s works and the author could either take or leave them.  This kept the author with the authority of the piece but also gave each piece the influence of the social interaction and influences from other authors.

This piece also suggested that meanings of words come from other words before them.  Without “school” there would be no “teachers”, or “class” nor would there be “students”.  This goes back to the idea of intertextuality and how each and every piece of writing (or given situation) is dependent upon what came before it and inspired that writings creation.

Video Blogs.

I thought that these videos accurately portrayed how many students feel about school and education: “We love learning.  We hate school.”

Today’s college students have more technology available to them than any generation before had ever dreamed of having.  Within arm’s reach I have a laptop, printer, cellphone, TV, DVD player….which I’m sure is a limited supply compared to some other college students out there.  But it’s still a lot.

I agree with Wesch when he says that “walls no longer mark the boundaries of our classrooms.”  Who could even expect to have a marker for boundaries with the world being accessible through our fingertips?

Students are able to research topics outside of their classroom, school, hometown, state, country, and even into other galaxies.  On their own, students are exploring the world and what interests them all throughout their day and during their spare time.  I think that it is important for teachers to become aware of this and to use technology as a way to encourage and inspire student learning and involvement in the classroom.