All of the articles for this week had to do with the
advancements of technology and how these advancements effect communications
between people, as well as how texts are read and knowledge is learned.
In Dennis Baron’s piece, From
Pencils to Pixels, it was surprising to me that a pencil could cause such uproar
and be viewed as an untrustworthy object when it came to writing and creating
records. Since the invention of the pencil, technology has expanded to pens,
printing presses, computers, iPads, etc. And just as the pencil caused
controversy, so do these inventions. How
people communicate, learn, and perform day-to-day task are being “taken over”
by technological advancements.
Baron also discusses the integration of computers in the
classrooms and what difficulties the instructors had with the technological
transition. The thought that teachers
used to have a fit over students using spellcheck before handing in a paper is
beyond me. It is a tool that may not
necessarily help students understand how to spell a word, but if used often
enough, they could become familiarized with the correct spelling. (This wuld b
a nice feetur for FB statises!! J)
Spellcheck has become essential for many students as well as those who are in
search of a job and need to ensure that everything on a resume is spelt
correctly.
Technology has become a vital piece of how we communicate
with family members, friends, educators, and coworkers…unless, of course, you
are a member of The Lead Pencil Club.
History Now
The libraries at my high school hated Wikipedia with an absolute passion. We would be scolded if they caught us on it,
and if we tried to reference it in a paper it wouldn’t be accepted. So, I still tend to think that Wikipedia is
an unreliable source that can’t be trusted.
History Now got me
thinking…
After reading the article, I see Wikipedia more as an
interactive encyclopedia, or blog, that people share information on. Is it correct information? I don’t know. But those who take the time to write
summaries of topics and subjects on the site most likely know a thing or two
about what they are writing and “become active on their own impulse.” Which is
encouraging, but I still don’t think my high school librarians would approve.
“…Wiki does not inevitably lead to chaotic contents because
for each person who deletes contributions or writes nonsense, there are several
others who cancel or improve the change again.”
This statement is reassuring, but what if you’re the poor college
student who waited until the last minute to write a final, 20-paged paper and
some bored middle-schooler *revised* all the information minutes before you
opened the site an no one has popped by to fix it yet?
I feel like Wikipedia is a good place to get started when
scoping out information, but that other sources should always be used to decipher if the information is true or not, which
should normally be done anyways.
The article also explained the changes of how users of
Wikipedia are communicating and interacting, which seemed to resemble a
blog-type atmosphere, which I had never thought of before and encourages it’s
users to interact with the text in a uniform, yet at the same time, diverse
way. This thought reminded me of
Whitacre and his virtual choir.
IText
“Texts provide shared visions around which joint work can be
organized. In this role, texts serve to
stabilize knowledge, a function that is important, for instance, in
establishing intellectual property.”
This quote made me think about Facebook and the kind of role
it plays in our society. Facebook is a
joint work. It is organized to bring
people from all around the world together, in one common “place” on the
web. It stabilizes many different types
of knowledge to others who look at ones page.
Things like family members, friends, location, emotions, relationship
status, birthdate, and the list goes on.
Facebook has brought about a new way of stabilizing personal knowledge
about people and their lifestyles. Facebook
“groups” have become a way of one to establish an intellectual property with
people who sharer similar interests and are also members of the social
group.
Facebook, as much as it can be looked down on for intruding
privacy and other accusations against the site, helps us “get to know” one
another in ways never thought possible, and in all reality, shows a person’s
true identity to the world more so than in-person meetings can do.
The Database and the Essay
While reading this piece, I was interested in the fact that
the author described writing as a social act, rather than individual. A description that I think fits writing and
the writing process very well. In my
creative writing course this last semester my professor encouraged us to give
suggestions to each short-story author in our class, as well as to her. So we would edit and revise each other’s
works and the author could either take or leave them. This kept the author with the authority of
the piece but also gave each piece the influence of the social interaction and
influences from other authors.
This piece also suggested that meanings of words come from
other words before them. Without “school”
there would be no “teachers”, or “class” nor would there be “students”. This goes back to the idea of intertextuality
and how each and every piece of writing (or given situation) is dependent upon
what came before it and inspired that writings creation.
Video Blogs.
I thought that these videos accurately portrayed how many
students feel about school and education: “We love learning. We hate school.”
Today’s college students have more technology available to
them than any generation before had ever dreamed of having. Within arm’s reach I have a laptop, printer,
cellphone, TV, DVD player….which I’m sure is a limited supply compared to some
other college students out there. But it’s
still a lot.
I agree with Wesch when he says that “walls no longer mark
the boundaries of our classrooms.” Who
could even expect to have a marker for boundaries with the world being accessible
through our fingertips?
Students are able to research topics outside of their
classroom, school, hometown, state, country, and even into other galaxies. On their own, students are exploring the world
and what interests them all throughout their day and during their spare
time. I think that it is important for
teachers to become aware of this and to use technology as a way to encourage
and inspire student learning and involvement in the classroom.
Interesting discussion about spell check. I hear teachers say to avoid it as well, but it is usually to catch homophones, changed proper nouns, et cetera. And spell check has indeed helped me learn to spell a few words correctly. It's a tool in the kit that ought to be used from time to time I'd say. Your discussion of it brings up that point, I think. Each new technology is a tool added to the kit, ready to be used should it be called upon. Need not be an obligation, and maybe some situations simply don't call for a given tool.
ReplyDelete